![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg8w0xZ-isqQem5jpTVsgL_0Nv6M6p2SoZ0C90JAjPq2GLBF9S0BdB3XKFN5Of46kfp-u8W6tcsYgBLAQjhGGCTLN8XbQ4qmNE-_6UgWp5AMrUyKtGz2hGKrKPalhRbSp2l2B32tXMqHHsv/s288/iphone_photo.jpg)
As I have had some intense conversations with educators on this issue, I have learned to "advocate" for sensory in a way where I don't ever mention the word sensory. After arguing with a school based autism strategist over adding two 3 minute sensory breaks of "heavy work" to an IEP, In desperation, I tried another approach.
I asked if this child could pick a friend daily to carry a tub of the lunch boxes left in the cafeteria. This would be about 3 minutes of sensory heavy work daily but I changed my advocating strategy. This became a part of his daily social interventions. This was viewed by the school as a social break and a chance for this child to have a meaningful social connection with a non special education peer.
This encounter happen several years ago. What I learned is that sometimes advocating takes a "backdoor approach." If you aren't being successful at gaining a sensory or any other accommodation/goal, could the activity address another area. Honestly, it is important to find ways to meet more than one objective at a time. This requires a little "out of the box thinking" but it will help your child to achieve more if you can advocate wisely.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad